European Flights delay, cancellation or denied boarding compensation (EC261/2004)

Click here to read all about how to claim EC261 compensation.

EC 261/2004 is a regulation by the European Union (EU) that outlines the rights of air passengers in case of denied boarding, flight cancellations, or long delays. The regulation was put in place to ensure that air travelers receive adequate compensation and assistance in the event of disruption to their flights.

Under EC 261/2004, passengers are entitled to compensation if their flight is cancelled or if they are denied boarding due to overbooking. The amount of compensation varies based on the distance of the flight and the length of the delay. For example, passengers flying within the EU are entitled to receive up to €600 ($717) in compensation for flight cancellations, and €250 ($298) for delays of two hours or more.

In addition to compensation, air travelers are also entitled to assistance from the airline in the form of meals, refreshments, hotel accommodation, and transportation if necessary. The length of the delay and the distance of the flight determine the level of assistance that must be provided by the airline.

It's important to note that EC 261/2004 only applies to flights that depart from an EU airport or flights that are operated by an EU-based airline and arrive at an EU airport. Furthermore, the regulation only applies to passengers traveling within the EU and not to those who are connecting to another flight.

In conclusion, EC 261/2004 is a crucial regulation that protects the rights of air passengers in the EU. It ensures that air travelers receive adequate compensation and assistance in the event of flight disruptions, making air travel a more secure and stress-free experience for all.

1. Eligible flights: The regulation applies to all flights within the EU and to flights departing from an EU airport, regardless of the airline's nationality. For example, if you're flying from Paris to New York with an American airline, and your flight is delayed or cancelled, you are entitled to the same rights and compensation as if you were flying with an EU-based airline.
   
   
2. Denied boarding: In the event of overbooking, airlines are required to first ask for volunteers to give up their seats in exchange for compensation or other benefits. If not enough volunteers come forward, passengers may be denied boarding against their will. In this case, passengers are entitled to compensation and assistance from the airline.
   
   
3. Cancelled flights: If your flight is cancelled, you are entitled to a refund or to be rerouted to your destination as soon as possible. In case of a cancellation, passengers are also entitled to compensation if the cancellation was not caused by extraordinary circumstances (such as adverse weather conditions or strikes).
   
   
4. Long delays: If your flight is delayed by two hours or more, you are entitled to assistance from the airline, such as food, drinks, and, if necessary, overnight accommodation. If the delay is five hours or more, you have the right to cancel your flight and receive a full refund.
   
   
5. Extraordinary circumstances: Airlines are not responsible for compensating passengers for disruptions caused by extraordinary circumstances, such as severe weather conditions, strikes, or security threats. In these cases, airlines must still provide passengers with assistance, such as food and drinks, but they are not required to provide compensation.
   
   
6. Time limits: Passengers have two years from the date of the flight to claim compensation under EC 261/2004. However, it is advisable to file a claim as soon as possible, as airlines may dispute claims that are made after a long period of time.

How to file EC 261 Claim for delay, cancellation, denied boarding etc?

To file a claim under EC 261/2004, you can follow these steps:

1. Gather information: Before you file a claim, gather as much information as possible about your flight, including your ticket, boarding pass, and any receipts for expenses you incurred as a result of the flight disruption.
   
   
2. Contact the airline: Contact the airline either by phone or email to let them know that you're planning to file a claim under EC 261/2004. You can also use their online complaint form if they have one. Provide them with all the relevant information and make a request for compensation.
   
   
3. Wait for a response: The airline is obliged to respond to your claim within a reasonable period of time, typically within two months. They will either accept your claim and offer you compensation, or they will reject your claim and provide you with the reasons for their decision.
   
   
4. Consider alternative dispute resolution: If the airline rejects your claim or fails to respond, you can consider alternative dispute resolution options, such as mediation or arbitration. Many airlines have internal dispute resolution procedures that you can follow.
   
   
5. It's important to keep in mind that airlines may dispute claims made under EC 261/2004, especially if they believe the flight disruption was caused by extraordinary circumstances. In these cases, it may be helpful to seek legal advice or to use alternative dispute resolution methods to resolve the dispute.

In conclusion, filing a claim under EC 261/2004 requires some effort and persistence on the part of the passenger. However, it can be worth it, as the regulation provides for significant compensation in case of flight disruptions.

Death Penalty??

Is it just and right to give Death Penalty
 (/Capital Punishment/Execution)?

Death Penalty is one of the oldest punishment in the world which means the executioner end a life of a criminal base on the right which given by the law. Most of the time the criminal have commit an serious crime. Although the term "serious crime" always being argue but in the country which still applying Death Penalty, in general murder with intention is one of the main reason of giving this punishment.

Nowadays, there're still 58 countries which included United State, Japan, Singapore, China, Taiwan, some of the Islam country. These countries still keep and continue executed people. 95 countries had already abandoned this kind of law. The rest of the country did not use it for more then 10 years; or just permit to give execution in war. All the members in the European Union have prohibited the use of Death Penalty according to the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights, Article 2.

People who support Death Penalty says it can reduce the number of crime and it is a good tools for police and judge, also it can make sure that the criminal can not commit any crime again which can protect and increase the security of the society.

Opponents claim the death penalty has not resiliency, if false positives, can not be relief; and death is also discriminationagainst minorities and the poor. Opponents argue that capital punishment does not deter crime more than life imprisonment, but to encourage a "violent culture", to pay more expensive than the cost oflife imprisonment and it  also violated human rights.

The intention of using Death Penalty

1)Principle of Fairness: People who consume a great lost and cost because of the action of the criminal and therefore the need to pay with there most precious asset, Life.

2)Prevention of Recidivism: The Criminal had and may have a sustained or significant risk of injury, so the community permanently excluded this risk factor id considered the best interests of the community.

3)Appear to prevent imitators: the Criminal had and may result possibility of sustained or significant damage, so use of Death Penalty can deter imitators to follow

so is it logical to use Death Penalty ?? Leave your comment on here Facebook or send me an email to let me know how do you think about it